An analysis of the communications surrounding 60 incoming CEOs:
Leaving first impressions to chance means squandering reputation
A new CEO’s arrival is one of the highest-attention moments for both the individual and the organisation they are joining. Investors, employees, customers and the media all want to know: Who is this person? What do they stand for? Where are they taking the company? How that moment is handled in communications shapes far more than a first impression. It determines, in large part, the judgement stakeholders form about the newcomer and in doing so, lays the foundation for reputation, credibility and future room to manoeuvre.
In our latest report, we examine how companies and CEOs have approached their communication around leadership transitions. The analysis covers 60 leadership changes at DAX, MDAX and SDAX companies as well as large Mittelstand firms, spanning 2024 (25 transitions) and 2025 (35). Just over half of the incoming CEOs (57%) were promoted from within; 43% were brought in from outside. The material assessed included press releases, LinkedIn posts and each CEO’s first major media interview.
Four profiles emerge as CEOs
Across all channels, a clear pattern emerges: CEO transitions are overwhelmingly narrated as a new beginning. The study identifies four recurring profiles:
- Implementers (36%) emphasise operational strength and the ability to act.
- Future-oriented leaders (29%) place innovation and long-term development at the centre.
- Shapers (16%) signal active transformation.
- Guardians (11%) prioritise continuity and stability.
Each channel serves its own purpose
These profiles are conveyed across different channels, each of which serves a distinct function: press releases establish the formal framework; LinkedIn makes the person accessible; the first media interview provides the platform for strategic substance.
Yet not everyone uses these platforms. 17% of the companies examined published no announcement, either at appointment or on the first day in post, leaving others to frame the narrative. Where announcements were published, the incoming CEO was quoted directly in only one third of cases. Among Mittelstand companies, that figure fell to just 14%.
Strategic positioning develops gradually
The substantive positioning follows a discernible arc: from the factual announcement, through personal visibility on LinkedIn, to strategic depth in the interview. That first major media conversation takes place, on average, 167 days after the start date, somewhat earlier at index-listed companies, considerably later in the Mittelstand.
In more than half of the interviews, clear strategic priorities are identifiable. CEOs appointed from outside articulate these significantly more often than those promoted internally suggesting that external appointments carry a stronger expectation to set a direction early.
Personality generates resonance
On LinkedIn, the platform’s fundamental rule holds true in CEO transition communications as well: personal perspective works. Posts written in the first person generate more than twice the engagement of company-centric content. CEOs who respond to comments achieve 77% more resonance. Emotional, motivating content consistently outperforms purely factual posts.
What does this mean in practice?
CEO transition communications are not a single event, they are a sequence. Those who plan that sequence strategically build a coherent picture of the individual and their leadership, creating orientation for stakeholders. Those who leave these decisions to chance miss a window that does not easily reopen.